Don't confuse them with facts
By Leonard Pitts Jr.
To listen to talk radio, to
watch TV pundits, to read a newspaper's online message board, is to realize
that increasingly, we are a people estranged from critical thinking, divorced
from logic, alienated from even objective truth.
I got an e-mail the other day that
depressed me.
It concerned a piece I recently did that
mentioned Henry Johnson, who was awarded the French Croix de Guerre in World
War I for single-handedly fighting off a company of Germans (some accounts say
there were 14, some say almost 30, the ones I find most authoritative say there
were about two dozen) who threatened to overrun his post.
Johnson managed this despite the fact that
he was only 5-foot-4 and 130 pounds, despite the fact that his gun had jammed,
despite the fact that he was wounded 21 times.
My mention of Johnson's heroics drew a
rebuke from a fellow named Ken Thompson, which I quote verbatim and in its
entirety:
"Hate to tell you that blacks were not
allowed into combat intell (sic) 1947, that fact. World War II ended in 1945.
So all that feel good, one black man killing two dozen Nazi, is just that, PC
bull."
In response, my assistant, Judi Smith, sent
Mr. Thompson proof of Johnson's heroics: a link to his page on the Web site of
Arlington National Cemetery. She thought this settled the matter.
Thompson's reply? "There is no race on
headstones and they didn't come up with the story in tell (sic) 2002."
Judi: "I guess you can choose to
believe Arlington National Cemetery or not."
Thompson: "It is what it is, you don't
believe either ... "
At this point, Judi forwarded me their
correspondence, along with a despairing note. She is probably somewhere drinking
right now.
You see, like me, she can remember a time
when facts settled arguments. This is back before everything became a partisan
shouting match, back before it was permissible to ignore or deride as
"biased" anything that didn't support your worldview.
If you and I had an argument and I produced
facts from an authoritative source to back me up, you couldn't just blow that
off. You might try to undermine my facts, might counter with facts of your own,
but you couldn't just pretend my facts had no weight or meaning.
But that's the intellectual state of the
union these days, as evidenced by all the people who still don't believe the
president was born in Hawaii or that the planet is warming. And by Mr.
Thompson, who doesn't believe Henry Johnson did what he did.
I could send him more proof, I suppose.
Johnson is lauded in history books ("Before the Mayflower" by Lerone
Bennett Jr., "The Dictionary of American Negro Biography" by Rayford
Logan and Michael Winston) and in contemporaneous accounts (The Saturday
Evening Post, The New York Times). I could also point out that blacks have
fought in every war in American history, though before Harry Truman
desegregated the military in 1948, they did so in Jim Crow units. Also, there
were no Nazis in World War I.
But those are "facts," and the
whole point here is that facts no longer mean what they once did. I suppose I
could also ignore him. But you see, Ken Thompson is not just some isolated
eccentric. No, he is the Zeitgeist personified.
To listen to talk radio, to watch TV
pundits, to read a newspaper's online message board, is to realize that
increasingly, we are a people estranged from critical thinking, divorced from
logic, alienated from even objective truth. We admit no ideas that do not
confirm us, hear no voices that do not echo us, sift out all information that
does not validate what we wish to believe.
I submit that any people thus handicapped
sow the seeds of their own decline; they respond to the world as they wish it
were rather to the world as it is. That's the story of the Iraq war.
But objective reality does not change
because you refuse to accept it. The fact that you refuse to acknowledge a wall
does not change the fact that it's a wall.
No comments:
Post a Comment