There IS a reason I teach English:

http://happyplace.someecards.com/america/former-high-school-teacher-congressman-irks-gop-by-marking-their-memos-with-a-red-pen/

While I think the Jack Daniels letter is more appropriate,

I cannot let this one go by:

file:///Users/jbrecher/Downloads/246989403-Randazza-v-Rsd-Asshats.pdf

Duh!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/20/technology/college-applicants-sanitize-online-profiles-as-college-pry.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=1

Why we need zealous advocates on BOTH sides:

http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/11/13/nsldoj.pdf

If you have wondered why I am so opposed to legal advertisements:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSUUpV_oLmU

For old 440-ers, class action rules and, for everyone else, even tho I hated RICO as a criminal lawyer . . .

http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/10/29/Trump%20Cert.pdf

Duh-h-h (and for the current 340s: pay attention)

http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-manuel-noriega-activision-call-of-duty-20141028-story.html

Now that my 340 class is about to reach "Lindsay land" . . .

it's time to play, read the complaint and see if you can find a NY cause of action!


http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/lindsay-lohan-bulks-up-lawsuit-739538

Case or no case?

https://music.yahoo.com/news/don-henley-sues-maker-henley-t-shirt-over-185600686-rolling-stone.html

O how I love being an English teacher teaching law!

http://chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2014/10/10/how-about-that/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

sound familiar?

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-texas-upskirt-law-overturned-20140919-story.html

Is following rules that hard?? -- "Counsel’s tactic would not be appropriate for a college term paper"

http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/OilSpill/Orders/9152014Order(OPATestMotToStrike).pdf

see the bottom of page 2

Arguing in my old home court (always know what you are doing!):

listen to 7:00 to 10:30

http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/OralArgRecordings/14/14-30053_9-5-2014.mp3

Have I not always said wording counts:

and I am certain they do often!

And you think I mention dressing in court too much . . .

http://abovethelaw.com/2014/09/judge-to-attorney-put-on-some-damn-socks/#more-339333

Maybe facts do not really matter . . .

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/02/us/politics/the-dubious-sources-of-some-supreme-court-facts.html?_r=1

What does this say about police officers you might meet in court?

http://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836

Where does Lohan get her legal advice?

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140702/11374927761/lindsay-lohan-moves-forward-with-lawsuit-against-gtav.shtml

Ah, Florida, yet again

http://news.yahoo.com/watch-florida-judge-beat-lawyer-middle-trial-155017957.html

Realize how few people get the issues correctly; that's the skill you need the most:

Notice the argument on pages 13-15;
Exactly what would the warrant application have needed to say to be proper in a case such as this?
(see the problem no one followed up on?)

http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/13-132_2co3.pdf